Web Hosting News
  Home arrow Web Hosting News arrow Page 4 - Third Time No Charm: ICANN Rejects XXX...
Web Hosting Articles  
Web Hosting FAQs  
Web Hosting How-Tos  
Web Hosting News  
Web Hosting Security  
IBM® developerWorks 
Sun Developer Network 
Weekly Newsletter 
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
ASP Web Hosting  
ASP.NET Web Hosting 
Budget Hosting 
Coldfusion 
Colocation 
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
E-Commerce Hosting 
Linux Web Hosting 
Managed Hosting 
Reseller Web Hosting 
Shared Hosting 
Small Business Hosting 
Virtual Private Servers 
Windows Web Hosting
 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
WEB HOSTING NEWS

Third Time No Charm: ICANN Rejects XXX Domain
By: Terri Wells
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 1
    2007-04-04

    Table of Contents:
  • Third Time No Charm: ICANN Rejects XXX Domain
  • A Lot Happens in Two Years
  • Not ICANN's Jurisdiction
  • Does .xxx Have a Future?

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    Third Time No Charm: ICANN Rejects XXX Domain - Does .xxx Have a Future?


    (Page 4 of 4 )

    So what happens next? This proposal for the .xxx domain had already been overhauled from an earlier version. It was first submitted in 2000, at which time ICANN raised the content regulation issue. When it was resubmitted in 2004, the proposal included language accommodating a policy-setting organization to address those particular concerns. But the revised proposal was rejected in May 2006, because ICANN believed that the language was vague enough to risk landing the content regulation task right back into ICANN's lap.

    So ICM clarified the language for this version of the proposal. Independent organizations would be hired by ICM, whose mandate would be to monitor rules compliance. The rules themselves were to be developed by the International Foundation for Online Responsibility, a separate body created specifically for that purpose. After going to all that effort, it's no wonder that Stuart Lawley is unhappy with ICANN's decision.

    "We are extremely disappointed by the board's action today," he said. "It is not supportable for any of the reasons articulated by the board, ignores the rules ICANN itself adopted for the RFP (request for proposals) and makes a mockery of ICANN bylaws' prohibition of unjustifiable discriminatory treatment." ICM is not giving up; when Lawley was asked by an Associated Press reporter if he might pursue a lawsuit against ICANN, he said such a course of action was "likely."

    This is the end of the line for this proposal, however. ICANN chairman Vinton Cerf has said that it would no longer be considered. That leaves ICM with three options. It could push ICANN to review its decision. It could file a lawsuit if, as Lawley has stated, it honestly believes that ICANN has not followed its own guidelines. Or it could come up with an entirely new proposal to be considered the next time ICANN examines bids for top-level domains. Whatever path ICM chooses, it seems likely that this isn't the last we'll hear of the .xxx domain.


    DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this article is not warranted or guaranteed by Developer Shed, Inc. The content provided is intended for entertainment and/or educational purposes in order to introduce to the reader key ideas, concepts, and/or product reviews. As such it is incumbent upon the reader to employ real-world tactics for security and implementation of best practices. We are not liable for any negative consequences that may result from implementing any information covered in our articles or tutorials. If this is a hardware review, it is not recommended to open and/or modify your hardware.

       · I hope you found this article informative; thanks for reading. Please feel free to...
       · Any time an organization is not doing what it was formulated to do and places itself...
     

    WEB HOSTING NEWS ARTICLES

    - The New FCC Regulator`s Mobile Plan
    - ICANN Ends Domain Tasting
    - Fake Security is Big Business
    - Microsoft Aims to Eliminate Piracy
    - Spam Increasing, and This Time it`s Personal
    - New Internet for Space, New Technologies to ...
    - FCC Frees White Space Spectrum for Wireless ...
    - An Old Trojan in New Clothing
    - DNS Flaw Causes Global Panic
    - ICANN Strives to Stop GoDaddy and Others fro...
    - No Winners in the Battle for the Internet
    - ICANN Decides To Expand Internet
    - Other Methods of the RBN
    - Around the Campfire with Google App Engine
    - DoS: No One is Safe






    © 2003-2009 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 1 Hosted by Hostway
    For more Enterprise Application Development news, visit eWeek