Web Hosting News

  Home arrow Web Hosting News arrow Page 4 - Net Neutrality Gets a Second Hearing
Web Hosting Articles  
Web Hosting FAQs  
Web Hosting How-Tos  
Web Hosting News  
Web Hosting Reviews  
Web Hosting Security  
Weekly Newsletter 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us 
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 

Net Neutrality Gets a Second Hearing
By: Terri Wells
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 2

    Table of Contents:
  • Net Neutrality Gets a Second Hearing
  • Momentum for Net Neutrality
  • The Opposing Viewpoint
  • Which Side Will Win?

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article




    Net Neutrality Gets a Second Hearing - Which Side Will Win?

    (Page 4 of 4 )

    The Democrats stand a good chance of winning the battle this time, but they won’t win it without a fight. The war of words raged on for months when the bill came up originally last year. It treated us to such spectacles as Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK), chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, describing the Internet as “a bunch of tubes” and explaining, somewhat incoherently, that “the Internet is not something you just dump something on” because those tubes can get clogged.

    It’s more than a little disturbing to think that the politicians who make important decisions about this technology do not have a good grasp of how it works, or in some cases even the correct terminology. In Stevens’ speech, for example, he mentioned that a member of his staff sent him “an internet” and it arrived five days later, apparently because the tubes were so clogged. How much bearing that will have on whether this bill gets passed remains to be seen.

    The whole issue can be framed in terms of two competing business models (as it was by the New York Times). It raises the question of who pays for the Internet, or more precisely, who pays for the Internet as it begins to deliver expanded capabilities to its users. Should it be the broadband service providers, the content providers, the consumers, or some combination? There may not be a good answer to this question. About the only thing anyone can count on is that, whether or not the legislation passes, the Internet will not look the same in four years as it looks today.

    DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this article is not warranted or guaranteed by Developer Shed, Inc. The content provided is intended for entertainment and/or educational purposes in order to introduce to the reader key ideas, concepts, and/or product reviews. As such it is incumbent upon the reader to employ real-world tactics for security and implementation of best practices. We are not liable for any negative consequences that may result from implementing any information covered in our articles or tutorials. If this is a hardware review, it is not recommended to open and/or modify your hardware.


    - FreedomPop Offering Open Wi-Fi Service
    - Go Daddy Goes to India
    - Netelligent, Savvis Add New Canadian Web Hos...
    - World IPv6 Launch Happens Today
    - IT Teams Struggle to Keep Pace with Malware
    - Lulz Security Hacks CIA, Takes Requests
    - Apple Unveils iCloud
    - Rackspace Introduces Cloud Load Balancers
    - Amazon Offers Cloud Drive, Disses Music Indu...
    - New Android.Pjapps Trojan
    - Copyright Fight over Hurt Locker Downloads I...
    - Data Reveals Many Browsers Remain Unpatched
    - PandaLabs Report - What Happens to Stolen In...
    - Safari Books Online Review
    - Hackers Targeting Human Rights Groups

    Developer Shed Affiliates


    © 2003-2019 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster - Follow our Sitemap