Web Hosting News

  Home arrow Web Hosting News arrow Page 3 - Cybersquatting on the Rise, Says WIPO
Web Hosting Articles  
Web Hosting FAQs  
Web Hosting How-Tos  
Web Hosting News  
Web Hosting Reviews  
Web Hosting Security  
Weekly Newsletter 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us 
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 

Cybersquatting on the Rise, Says WIPO
By: Terri Wells
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 3

    Table of Contents:
  • Cybersquatting on the Rise, Says WIPO
  • Who are the Victims?
  • Does the Dispute Resolution System Work?
  • Will it Keep Working?

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article




    Cybersquatting on the Rise, Says WIPO - Does the Dispute Resolution System Work?

    (Page 3 of 4 )

    The system is popular, and itís no wonder. It allows anyone who believes they have a right to a domain name to get it back without fighting an expensive legal battle or paying large sums of money. It costs only about $1,500 to file a claim with WIPO, and the case can be resolved in months rather than years. Complainants do have to prove certain points, however. For a good examination of the process, check this article (http://www.seochat.com/c/a/Search-Engine-
    ), which covers what Google went through last year in dealing with a cybersquatter.

    Itís not just the money, either. Sure, cost effectiveness is an important factor, but the process itself is very predictable and swift. Most complainants who choose to use the UDRP rather than traditional litigation consider it to be a far quicker and cheaper way of protecting their trademark rights against cybersquatting.

    With something as global as the Internet, itís important to have a process whose validity and jurisdiction is recognized throughout the world. Fortunately, WIPOís Arbitration Center is set up to handle cases in different languages, allowing parties from all over the world to file complaints under the UDRP. In addition to the countries mentioned in the previous section, cases were filed in 2005 by complainants from Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Brazil, China, Honduras, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Morocco, Qatar, Senegal, South Africa, Tanzania, the United Arab Emirates and Venezuela.

    Itís worth keeping in mind that WIPOís Arbitration Center canít force any financial penalties onto anyone. When it decides in favor of the complainant, it usually forces the cybersquatter to hand over the disputed domain name(s). And by the way, if you want to know another possible reason the UDRP is so popular, consider the Arbitration Centerís record: it has decided in favor of the complainant in 84 percent of its cases.

    More Web Hosting News Articles
    More By Terri Wells


    - FreedomPop Offering Open Wi-Fi Service
    - Go Daddy Goes to India
    - Netelligent, Savvis Add New Canadian Web Hos...
    - World IPv6 Launch Happens Today
    - IT Teams Struggle to Keep Pace with Malware
    - Lulz Security Hacks CIA, Takes Requests
    - Apple Unveils iCloud
    - Rackspace Introduces Cloud Load Balancers
    - Amazon Offers Cloud Drive, Disses Music Indu...
    - New Android.Pjapps Trojan
    - Copyright Fight over Hurt Locker Downloads I...
    - Data Reveals Many Browsers Remain Unpatched
    - PandaLabs Report - What Happens to Stolen In...
    - Safari Books Online Review
    - Hackers Targeting Human Rights Groups

    Developer Shed Affiliates


    © 2003-2019 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster - Follow our Sitemap