Web Hosting Articles
  Home arrow Web Hosting Articles arrow It was the best of hosts, it was the w...
Web Hosting Articles  
Web Hosting FAQs  
Web Hosting How-Tos  
Web Hosting News  
IBM® developerWorks 
Sun Developer Network 
Weekly Newsletter 
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
ASP Web Hosting  
ASP.NET Web Hosting 
Budget Hosting 
Coldfusion 
Colocation 
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
E-Commerce Hosting 
Linux Web Hosting 
Managed Hosting 
Reseller Web Hosting 
Shared Hosting 
Small Business Hosting 
Virtual Private Servers 
Windows Web Hosting
 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
WEB HOSTING ARTICLES

It was the best of hosts, it was the worst of hosts
By: Eberhart and Duchesne
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars / 19
    2004-12-08

    Table of Contents:
  • It was the best of hosts, it was the worst of hosts
  • Mid-Range and Above
  • Budget Hosting: Are they All Created Equal?
  • Services

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    It was the best of hosts, it was the worst of hosts


    (Page 1 of 4 )

    When looking for a Web host, one of the first questions to ask yourself is whether you look for a Quality (and somewhat costly) host, or whether you opt for the budget option. Today, we'll take a look at both ends of the spectrum and find out that although it may take a lot of digging, there's a good chance of finding a diamond in the rough.

    Web Hosting: Which is the Host with the Most?

    So you want to publish a web site do you? Welcome to the club. These days it seems that almost everyone has a web site of some kind, and thousands more continue to be launched every day. It's challenging enough to design a site and fill it with interesting content, but when all is said and done another challenge still remains - where to host it?

    A popular choice for newbie webmasters, and even experienced ones, is to secure a free hosting plan with a company such as Yahoo! Geocities, Tripod or Angelfire. While these are easy to setup and free of charge, they do have limitations. Most free hosts don't offer all the nice features that paid hosts do such as FTP access, CGI-BIN, or your own personal domain name. Instead you're stuck with minimal features and a generic URL such as www.freewebhost.com/marcswebsite. This somewhat limits your web site‘s potential. Most free hosts also require you to run banners or pop-up ads on your web site to make it worth their while - these banners and pop-ups can obstruct the view of your web page and ultimately annoy visitors and drive them away. Lastly, most free hosts have a daily bandwidth limit that is very small, so if you do get a lot of traffic you'll most likely exceed the allotted bandwidth and your site will be temporarily disabled. Overall I would recommend free web hosts for people that are new to web hosting and want to get a feel for how it works. I'd also recommend them for web sites that are personal in nature (such as an online journal) as well as web sites that don't plan to generate any revenue. Free web hosts are a great stepping stone to paid web hosts - I myself starting building web sites 4 years ago using free hosts, and today I run several high traffic web sites that are hosted on paid web hosting plans.

    Now it's time to get into the good stuff - paid web hosting. Web hosting companies that charge money for their services are plentiful on the Internet, and feature a wide array of hosting packages at various price points. First we begin with so called "budget" web hosts, who claim to offer you the world for only $1 per month. Having used numerous such companies I feel I must tell you to proceed with caution here, as these companies aren't all that they are cracked up to be. Many claim to offer 24/7 e-mail support, which in my experience turned out to be 0/0 e-mail support. My e-mails were either never answered or answered a week after I sent them. Even when I got a response it was generic in nature and completely unhelpful. Also, expect frequent outages with these budget web hosts as they rarely even have their own web servers - often they are reselling space on someone else's web servers over which they have no control. One budget web host I used went down unexpectedly for 6 days, and they didn‘t even bother to notify their customers. As a result, my web site was down for 6 days and I lost most of my visitors as well as my hard-earned search engine rankings. Lesson learned: if the reliability and success of your web site is important to you, budget web hosting might not be the answer. However, this is not to say that all budget web hosts are bad - 1dollarhosting.com is one of the leaders in the budget web hosting arena and has quite a good reputation.

    More Web Hosting Articles Articles
    More By Eberhart and Duchesne


     

    WEB HOSTING ARTICLES ARTICLES

    - XOHM: Really an Alternative?
    - LeaseWeb Web Host Review
    - What Google Knows About You and Its Relation...
    - Cloud Computing
    - File Hosting
    - Image Hosting
    - Fantastico Automates Web Applications
    - WOT: Web of Trust Browser Extension
    - DomainKeys Offers Phishing Solution
    - IBM`s Solar Servers: Energy Efficiency for D...
    - Four Useful Web-Based Productivity Applicati...
    - You and Your Privacy
    - What is the Information Card Foundation (ICF...
    - The Internet`s Most Wanted Spammers
    - Web Browsers: The Best of ‘08






    © 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 6 hosted by Hostway
    Stay green...Green IT