Web Hosting Articles

  Home arrow Web Hosting Articles arrow Page 2 - ICANN: Stick to Technology, not Morali...
Web Hosting Articles  
Web Hosting FAQs  
Web Hosting How-Tos  
Web Hosting News  
Web Hosting Reviews  
Web Hosting Security  
Weekly Newsletter 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us 
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 

ICANN: Stick to Technology, not Morality
By: Terri Wells
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 3

    Table of Contents:
  • ICANN: Stick to Technology, not Morality
  • Secretive ICANN
  • Urgency and Scope of Domain Freedom
  • Keep the Core Neutral

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article




    ICANN: Stick to Technology, not Morality - Secretive ICANN

    (Page 2 of 4 )

    ICANN had been widely lambasted for its lack of transparency. There were some transparency issues in this decision; many felt that ICANN didn’t properly address the points raised by its members and members of the Internet community who participated in the debate over the proposed .XXX gTLD. But there have been other cases in which ICANN has been less than open.

    The most recent one I know of may seem small, but it is significant. Earlier this year, Edward Hasbrouck pointed out that the registry agreements for the .AERO, .COOP, and .MUSEUM domains had expired in December. Craig Schwartz, ICANN’s chief gTLD registry liaison, responded that “all three sTLD agreements are current through extensions that have been granted to afford time necessary to conclude negotiations.”

    No big deal, right? Wrong. As Hasbrouck pointed out in a reply to Schwartz’s message, ICANN’s procedural bylaws call for transparency; they can’t just “grant” an extension without holding a public forum for discussion of the proposed amendments to the registries’ agreements. And the discussion is supposed to be available through ICANN’s web site. Hasbrouck naturally requested that ICANN reveal the “URL of the minutes and the reference number of the resolution of the Board of Directors” approving the amendments; the URL at which the amendments were “posted for public comment prior to the Board’s consideration of each proposal;” and all “records of ICANN’s consideration of these proposals.” Given ICANN’s record up to now, Hasbrouck may have a long wait.

    ICANN seemed to be willing to take some steps toward improving its accountability and transparency at its latest public meeting in Puerto Rico. Still, it is ICANN’s habit of hiding its actions that we have to go on now, and that habit argues very strongly against allowing ICANN to consider censoring domains according to “legal norms relating to morality and public order,” as one ICANN working group’s recent report suggested. How would we know who or what was influencing ICANN’s censorship decisions?

    More Web Hosting Articles Articles
    More By Terri Wells


    - Top Wordpress Plugins for SEO
    - Top Drupal Evaluation and Rating Modules
    - Free Network Monitoring Programs for Max Per...
    - E-store Hosting: Free Options for Beginners
    - Dropbox: The Ultimate File-Sharing and Synci...
    - Reviewing the Best Free Web Hosting Sites
    - Businesses Turn to Reseller Web Hosting for ...
    - Multiple Data Center Hosting
    - Web Hosting Goes Green
    - Web Hosting Technology Overview
    - Collaborate: An Examination of Tools for Gro...
    - Social Networking Security
    - Domain Names 101
    - Top Software to Help Manage Your Websites
    - The Evolution of Phishing

    Developer Shed Affiliates


    © 2003-2019 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster - Follow our Sitemap