Web Hosting Articles

  Home arrow Web Hosting Articles arrow Page 4 - Don’t Fall Victim to Typosquatting
Web Hosting Articles  
Web Hosting FAQs  
Web Hosting How-Tos  
Web Hosting News  
Web Hosting Reviews  
Web Hosting Security  
Weekly Newsletter 
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us 
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
WEB HOSTING ARTICLES

Don’t Fall Victim to Typosquatting
By: Terri Wells
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 10
    2005-11-23

    Table of Contents:
  • Don’t Fall Victim to Typosquatting
  • There’s Gold in Them Thar Typos
  • Fighting Typosquatting
  • Bring in the Big Guns

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     

    SEARCH WEB HOSTERS

    TOOLS YOU CAN USE

    advertisement

    Don’t Fall Victim to Typosquatting - Bring in the Big Guns


    (Page 4 of 4 )

    If you own a website that has become a victim of typosquatting, you probably want the typosquatter to turn over the domain name and agree to never use it again. There is a procedure designed to help you accomplish this. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has a Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy that serves as an alternative to trademark lawsuits. It is handled by the National Arbitration Forum, which hears thousands of domain name disputes every year. A typical decision from this organization may run to about seven pages, and contain relatively little legalese. Typically, when a person signs up for a domain name, he or she agrees to resolve domain name disputes through this policy.

    As the one bringing the complaint, you will have to prove three things:

    • That the typosquatter’s domain name is confusingly similar to yours.
    • That the typosquatter did not have any rights or legitimate interest in the domain name.
    • That the typosquatter registered and used the domain name in bad faith.

    If the typosquatter’s domain name is different from yours by only a letter or two, or a couple of letters being switched around, you probably have a strong case that the two names are confusingly similar. In the case of Google, Gridasov’s four domains were each different from Google’s by only one letter.

    You will probably need to prove your own rights to your domain name. If it is the same as your business name, you can satisfy this by showing the date of your filing the name with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (as Google did), or possibly the date you registered the name of your business with your state. Obviously, if you have a trademark to your name, and you can prove it was filed before the typosquatter bought the domain in question, you have a stronger case.

    If the typosquatter is hosting malware on his website, then that fact alone ought to be enough to prove that he is acting in bad faith. Otherwise, it goes without saying that you should save all of your communications with the typosquatter. One finding under the Google ruling that you might find comforting was that “Under the policy, typosquatting is itself evidence of bad faith registration and use of the disputed domain name and the Panel finds no reason to distinguish Respondent’s use of the practice in this instance.”

    When you file for resolution under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, it is common to request that the domain name in question be handed over to you. The typosquatter will be contacted and given a chance to respond to your complaint. They might respond, or they might not; in Google’s case, Gridasov did not respond, which effectively expedited matters for the search engine. Resolution may take anywhere from a few weeks to a few months, but that is typically faster than a court case.


    DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this article is not warranted or guaranteed by Developer Shed, Inc. The content provided is intended for entertainment and/or educational purposes in order to introduce to the reader key ideas, concepts, and/or product reviews. As such it is incumbent upon the reader to employ real-world tactics for security and implementation of best practices. We are not liable for any negative consequences that may result from implementing any information covered in our articles or tutorials. If this is a hardware review, it is not recommended to open and/or modify your hardware.

    WEB HOSTING ARTICLES ARTICLES

    - Top Wordpress Plugins for SEO
    - Top Drupal Evaluation and Rating Modules
    - Free Network Monitoring Programs for Max Per...
    - E-store Hosting: Free Options for Beginners
    - Dropbox: The Ultimate File-Sharing and Synci...
    - Reviewing the Best Free Web Hosting Sites
    - Businesses Turn to Reseller Web Hosting for ...
    - Multiple Data Center Hosting
    - Web Hosting Goes Green
    - Web Hosting Technology Overview
    - Collaborate: An Examination of Tools for Gro...
    - Social Networking Security
    - Domain Names 101
    - Top Software to Help Manage Your Websites
    - The Evolution of Phishing

    Developer Shed Affiliates

     




    © 2003-2017 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster - Follow our Sitemap